Tag: NBA

  • Nigerian makes Billboard’s 2025 list of top music lawyers

    Nigerian makes Billboard’s 2025 list of top music lawyers

    An entertainment lawyer, Akinyemi Ayinoluwa, who is a partner at Hightower Solicitors and Advocate, has been named one of the most important music lawyers in the world by Billboard for 2025.

    The recognition highlights Ayinoluwa’s exceptional expertise in music law and dedication to championing the rights of record producers and songwriters.

    According to Billboard’s April edition, Hightower Solicitors, led by Ayinoluwa, recently finalised a publishing agreement with Empire Music, an international music label.

    Also with Ragee, a prominent Afrobeats producer who co-produced Chris Brown’s “Sensational”, which earned a nomination for Best African Music Performance at the 2025 Grammy Awards.

    This achievement showcases Hightower’s expertise in guiding clients to build valuable music catalogues.

    In an interview Ayinoluwa said: “I feel blessed to be recognised by Billboard as one of the most important music lawyers in the world.

    “I’m dedicating this to my late dad for instilling in me the discipline to stay on a journey, also for introducing me to the legal profession and then also for accommodating my love for music.”

    Ayinoluwa’s said that his journey in music law began when he realised that record producers and songwriters were often marginalised and underrepresented in the industry.

    “As a young lawyer, I saw an opportunity to make a difference and I have since dedicated my career to advocating for their rights.

    “For the past 13 years, I’ve been championing record producers and songwriters.

    “I think the reason for that is because, as a young lawyer at that time, I was in my third year of being a lawyer, and the recording artists were already doing well.

    “It wasn’t easy for a young lawyer to maybe represent them, and the record producers and songwriters were the underrepresented and marginalised individuals in the music industry,” he said.

    According to Ayinoluwa, his music law practice focuses on representing recording artists, songwriters, record producers, record labels, investors in music, and talent managers.

    He said one of the reasons for building strong relationships with clients was understanding their vision and pain.

    “When you understand it, it’s easy to guide them through all the legal challenges that might arise as they continue to proceed with their journey in music,” he said.

    According to Akinyemi, the biggest challenge facing Nigerian record producers and songwriters is being compensated appropriately for their work.

    “My recognition will inspire me to do more, to do more qualitative work, and to continue to champion the interests of our clients.

    “I think it helps to show that, yes, there’s excellence in Africa. African lawyers can do important work,” he said.

    Looking to the future, Ayinoluwa said he was excited to announce a mentorship programme to support the next generation of Nigerian entertainment lawyers.

  • Heat and Grizzlies take final spots in the NBA playoffs

    Heat and Grizzlies take final spots in the NBA playoffs

    Tyler Herro scored 30 points as the Miami Heat reached the NBA playoffs with a thrilling 123-114 overtime defeat of the Atlanta Hawks in their Eastern Conference play-in clash on Friday.

    The Heat, which recovered from a 10-game losing streak in March to reach the play-in, will now face top-seeded Cleveland Cavaliers in the opening round of the playoffs.

    Miami become the first tenth-seed to reach the NBA playoffs via the play-in and they did so via two wins on the road, having also won in Chicago on Wednesday.

    In Atlanta, Miami dominated the opening half, leading by 17 points before going in 62-53 up at the interval. But the Hawks fought back superbly, taking the lead 91-88 with 7:36 left.

    Atlanta then opened up a 98-92 advantage before Miami came back again only for Trae Young to level the game with 1.1 seconds remaining after a driving lay-up.

    But the Heat saved their best for last with Davion Mitchell making three three-pointers in overtime and Herro adding two more.

    “Two competitive teams, fighting for the last spot in the playoffs. That was exactly what you saw. Both teams were deserving. I loved how my team fought,” said Herro.

    “Every single run that they made, we answered. And I feel like this entire season has really built us up for this point.

    The Cavaliers will start as heavy favourites in the best-of-seven series which gets underway in Cleveland on Sunday.

    Young top-scored for Atlanta with 29 points while Onyeka Okongwu scored 28 and grabbed 12 rebounds.

    The final spot in the Western Conference playoffs was secured by the Memphis Grizzlies which beat the Dallas Mavericks 120-106.

    Despite dealing with an ankle problem, Ja Morant scored 22 points and made nine assists for the Grizzlies  who will face the first seeded Oklahoma City Thunder in the first round.

    For Dallas, the defeat concludes a miserable season which included the departure of star Luka Doncic to the Los Angeles Lakers.

    Anthony Davis, who moved to Dallas in that controversial trade, received medical treatment for injury problems throughout the game but led the team with 40 points and nine rebounds.

    Memphis led by 15 points at the end of the first quarter and although Dallas fought back in the third, they never truly threatened the Grizzlies.

    Morant indicated that the painkillers had worked for his sprained ankle.

    “I couldn’t feel it. That’s why I was out there,” he told ESPN.

    “(We are) the underdogs. Obviously, we go on to face a tough team in OKC, but we have all the confidence in ourselves and (are) ready to go Sunday.

    “It’s a big challenge. Obviously, you know, we all have seen them, you know, over this season. Very well-rounded team. We have to be very sound defensively. Very disciplined and just play our type of basketball,” he added.

  • Causes, consequences of failing justice system in Nigeria

    Causes, consequences of failing justice system in Nigeria

    The justice system is often regarded as the backbone of a democratic society. It is responsible for maintaining law and order, protecting individual rights, and providing mechanisms for dispute resolution.

    However, Nigeria’s justice system is increasingly viewed as failing, characterized by inefficiencies, corruption, lack of access, and inadequate resources. This article explores the multifaceted challenges that contribute to the deterioration of Nigeria’s justice system, analyzes the consequences of these failings, and suggests potential reforms for restoring public faith in the legal framework.

    Historical Context

    To understand the current state of Nigeria’s justice system, it is essential to consider its historical context. Nigeria’s legal framework has evolved through various phases, including colonial rule, military dictatorship, and the subsequent return to democracy in 1999. Each phase has left an imprint on the justice system, often prioritizing the interests of those in power over the equitable application of justice to the populace. While the 1999 Constitution guarantees the right to a fair trial and due process, the legal system remains burdened by historical legacies of corruption and inefficiency.

    Challenges of the Justice System: Corruption

    Corruption permeates every level of Nigeria’s justice system, eroding public trust and compromising the integrity of legal proceedings. Numerous studies and reports have highlighted the prevalence of bribery and graft within courts, police, and correctional facilities. Judicial officers and law enforcement personnel sometimes prioritize personal gain over their duties, leading to a system where justice is often contingent upon one’s financial resources rather than the merits of a case. This corruption not only hampers fair and impartial hearings but also contributes to a growing sense of disillusionment among citizens who feel that the justice system is inaccessible to them.

    The prevalence of corruption can delay justice. Delays in court proceedings due to bribery and other corrupt practices can lead to prolonged trials and wrongful convictions or acquittals.Victims of injustice often lose faith in the legal system, which can lead to social unrest and a lack of legitimacy for legal institutions.

    The independence of the judiciary can be compromised by political pressures and interference, where judges may be coerced into making decisions that align with the interests of those in power.

    Inefficiency and Institutional Weakness

    The Nigerian justice system is notorious for its inefficiencies, resulting from a combination of bureaucratic hurdles, lack of resources, and inadequate infrastructure. Caseloads in courts are often overwhelming, causing significant delays in the adjudication of cases. It is not uncommon for a single case to linger for years, depriving individuals of timely justice. These inefficiencies are exacerbated by outdated laws and procedures that have not evolved to meet contemporary societal needs. The lack of technological integration further complicates matters, with many records maintained in physical form, leading to lost files and mismanagement.

    Addressing institutional weaknesses in Nigeria requires comprehensive reforms that promote transparency, accountability, and efficiency. Efforts must be made to strengthen legal and regulatory frameworks, enhance capacity-building through education and training, and foster a culture of accountability within all levels of government. Engaging civil society, harnessing technology, and promoting grassroots initiatives can also play a crucial role in institutional strengthening. Ultimately, a commitment to good governance and the rule of law is essential for fostering sustainable development in Nigeria.

    Inaccessibility

    Access to justice is a fundamental human right; however, for many Nigerians, this remains an elusive goal. High legal fees, inadequate legal representation, and a lack of legal awareness among the population prevent marginalized communities from seeking justice. The concept of pro bono legal services is not well established, and many citizens are unaware of their rights or the legal resources available to them. As a result, individuals from low-income backgrounds are disproportionately affected by the failings of the justice system, perpetuating cycles of injustice and inequality.

    Inhumane Detention Conditions

    Nigeria’s correctional facilities are often overcrowded and poorly maintained, violating international standards for humane treatment. Many detainees await trial in conditions that can only be described as inhumane, leading to severe human rights abuses. The lengthy pre-trial detention that many experience reflects the systemic failings of the justice system in safeguarding individual rights. This situation is compounded by a lack of rehabilitation programs, meaning that correctional facilities often perpetuate criminal behaviour instead of facilitating reintegration into society.

    Vulnerable populations, including women, children, and those with mental health issues, often face even harsher conditions. Women may be subjected to gender-based violence or exploitation within detention facilities, and children may be detained with adult prisoners.

    Detainees with mental health issues often receive inadequate care and are sometimes subjected to punitive measures instead of medical treatment. There is often a lack of accountability for human rights abuses in detention practices. Complaints regarding treatment in prisons or police detention facilities may go uninvestigated or unaddressed.

    Courts may not provide effective remedies for victims, allowing abuses to continue with little consequence for perpetrators. Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, have consistently called for reforms to address the issues of inhuman detention practices in Nigeria. Such reforms may include improving prison conditions, providing adequate legal representation, and ensuring that laws against torture and abuse are strictly enforced.

    Addressing inhuman detention practices in Nigeria requires concerted efforts from the government, civil society, and the international community. It involves not only improving living conditions and treatment of detainees but also ensuring the rule of law and access to justice for all citizens. Comprehensive reforms, systematic changes in law enforcement practices, and strict adherence to human rights principles are crucial for creating a more humane and fair detention system in Nigeria.

    Violence and Insecurity

    The rising tide of violence, particularly from armed groups, crime syndicates, and communal conflicts, has placed additional strain on the justice system. Security agencies often find themselves overwhelmed, and the inability to protect citizens leads to further erosion of trust in legal institutions. In many cases, victims of violent crimes feel powerless to seek justice, fearing retribution or lack of accountability for perpetrators. This culture of impunity undermines the rule of law and creates an environment where citizens are less likely to engage with formal legal processes.

    Consequences of a Failing Justice System

    The consequences of Nigeria’s failing justice system are far-reaching, affecting not only individuals but also the broader societal fabric.

    Erosion of Public Trust

    Widespread corruption and inefficiency have led to a significant erosion of public trust in legal institutions. Citizens increasingly view the justice system as biased and ineffective, leading to a reluctance to seek legal remedies for grievances. This disillusionment contributes to a culture of impunity, where individuals may resort to extrajudicial means to settle disputes, further undermining the rule of law.

    Social Inequality and Disempowerment

    The inability of the justice system to provide equitable access to justice perpetuates social inequality. Marginalized communities, particularly those in rural areas or from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, are disproportionately affected. The resulting disempowerment has a cascading effect, as individuals who cannot seek justice for rights violations become trapped in cycles of poverty and marginalization.

    Hindered Economic Development

    A reliable justice system is a cornerstone for sustainable economic development. Investors typically seek environments where the rule of law is upheld, and contracts are enforced. Corruption and inefficiencies deter foreign investment and can lead to a lack of confidence in the domestic legal framework. Consequently, Nigeria’s economic potential is significantly hampered by the failings of its justice system.

    Potential Reforms

    Addressing the challenges within Nigeria’s justice system requires a multifaceted reform strategy that engages various stakeholders.

    Strengthening Institutions

    Improving the integrity of the judiciary and law enforcement agencies is paramount. This can be achieved through rigorous training, better remuneration to reduce incentives for corruption, and the establishment of independent oversight bodies to monitor and investigate judicial conduct. Increasing transparency through the publication of court decisions and financial transactions can also enhance accountability.

    Access to Justice Initiatives

    Expanding access to legal services is critical. The establishment of more legal aid clinics, alongside awareness campaigns about legal rights, can empower citizens to seek justice. Collaboration with local NGOs and community organisations can help bridge the gap between legal services and those most in need.

    Infrastructure and Technological Advancement

    Investing in technological solutions such as case management systems, online filing, and data digitization-can reduce inefficiencies and help streamline court processes. Modernizing the legal framework to discard or amend outdated procedures will facilitate quicker adjudication of cases.

    Human Rights Protection

    Improving conditions in correctional facilities should be a priority, including the implementation of rehabilitation programs. Addressing human rights issues holistically requires collaboration with civil society organisations to monitor conditions and advocate for the rights of detainees.

    Community Engagement

    Encouraging community involvement in legal processes can foster a greater understanding of the law and build trust. Community courts or alternative dispute resolution mechanisms can serve as effective platforms for conflict resolution, particularly in rural areas where formal institutions may be less accessible.

    Conclusion

    Nigeria’s justice system is at a critical juncture, faced with numerous challenges that undermine its efficacy and credibility. Corruption, inefficiency, inaccessibility, and human rights abuses conspire to create an environment where justice remains out of reach for many citizens. Addressing these issues requires concerted efforts from both the government and civil society to reform institutions and processes. Without significant changes, the justice system risks further decline, which could exacerbate societal divisions and undermine the rule of law. By prioritizing justice system reform, Nigeria can work towards a more equitable and just society, re-establishing faith in the legal framework and promoting democracy and human rights for all citizens.

  • Rivers: NBA blasts Tinubu, condemns suspension of Fubara, calls it unconstitutional

    Rivers: NBA blasts Tinubu, condemns suspension of Fubara, calls it unconstitutional

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has strongly opposed President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State and his suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and members of the Rivers State House of Assembly.

    The NBA, in a statement released on March 18, 2025, by its president, Mazi Afam Osigwe, SAN, emphasized that the President lacks constitutional power to unilaterally remove elected officials under the guise of emergency rule.

    President Tinubu, in his national address, cited rising political tensions and recent acts of pipeline vandalism as justification for the emergency declaration.

    However, the NBA argues that such actions, while concerning, do not meet the constitutional threshold for suspending an elected government.

    The NBA pointed to Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, which governs the procedure for declaring a state of emergency. While this section grants the President emergency powers, it does not allow for the removal or suspension of elected officials. The NBA stressed that the only constitutional method for removing a governor or deputy governor is through impeachment as outlined in Section 188.

    Furthermore, the removal of lawmakers must adhere to electoral laws and constitutional provisions. The NBA insisted that a state of emergency does not equate to an automatic dissolution of an elected government, and any attempt to do so is an overreach of executive power.

    The NBA also highlighted that Tinubu’s emergency declaration requires approval from the National Assembly within two days if in session, or ten days if not. Until such approval is granted, the declaration remains legally ineffective.

    Condemning the move as a “dangerous affront” to democracy, the NBA warned that allowing the suspension of elected officials under emergency rule could set a precedent for removing state governments based on political considerations. It urged the National Assembly to reject any attempt to ratify the unconstitutional suspension of Rivers State officials.

    The NBA called on all stakeholders, including the judiciary, civil society, and international observers, to monitor the situation closely. It reaffirmed its commitment to upholding Nigeria’s democracy and urged the federal government to resolve political conflicts through constitutional and legal mechanisms, not executive orders.

    The association concluded by insisting that Nigeria’s democracy must be protected at all costs, warning that any unconstitutional interference in state governance threatens the nation’s democratic stability.

  • Leave Rivers Judiciary out of crisis – NBA urges Amaewhule, others

    Leave Rivers Judiciary out of crisis – NBA urges Amaewhule, others

    PORT HARCOURT: The Nigeria Bar Association, NBA, has urged the Rivers State House of Assembly and other actors in the ongoing political unrest in the state to leave the Judiciary arm out of the imbroglio.

    The eight branches of the NBA in the state, in a press statement in Port Harcourt on Tuesday, stated that they would not allow another shutdown of the court in the state.

    The press statement was jointly signed by Cordelia U. Eke (Mrs) Chairman, Port Harcourt Branch, Hilda Desmond-lhekaire (PhD), Chairman Ahoada Branch, Simple Dioha, Esq., Chairman, Isiokpo Branch, Abiye A. Abo, Esq., Chairman, Degema Branch, Dr. N.A. Duson, Chairman, Bori Branch, Dr. Celestine N. Nwankwo, Chairman, Okehi Branch, Tamunosiki A. Roberts, Esq., Chairman, Okrika Branch, and Ekeledinichukwu Ordu, Esq., Chairman, Omoku Branch.

    Addressing the press on behalf of the eight branch chairmen, Tamunosiki A. Roberts, Esq., the Chairman, Okrika Branch, said the attention of the eight branches of the NBA has been drawn to a call by the House of Assembly on the Department of State Security, DSS, to investigate the Chief Judge of the State, Justice Simeon Amadi, describing the development as unfortunate.

    Roberts cautioned that the judiciary should not be dragged into the political imbroglio in the state, adding the judiciary cannot afford to experience shutdown of courts in the state.

    He said: “The attention of the 8 branches of the NBA in Rivers State, has been drawn to a resolution passed by the Rivers State House of Assembly on Wednesday, 12th of March, 2025 directing the Department of State Security (DSS) to investigate the Rivers State Chief Judge on allegations of falsification of age. It is quite unfortunate, that despite the already heated polity in Rivers State, we are still experiencing escalations such as this.

    “Thus, there is need for mutual respect amongst all the parties. We are not unaware of the existing political impasse between the Legislature and the Executive Arms of Government in Rivers State, however, we must caution that the Judiciary should not be drawn into the ongoing imbroglio for no just cause.

    “We reiterate that the independence of the Judiciary is crucial to the sustenance of peace and stability in the State, as contending parties ultimately resort to the Judiciary for the resolution of disputes as has recently been witnessed at the Supreme Court.

    “There is no need to escalate tensions as the stability of Rivers State is crucial to the economy of the State and the Country. We can easily recall the incidents in 2014-2015 which exposed the Judiciary and Judicial Officers that resulted in the closure of our Courts. We cannot afford to experience a similar occurrence in the present times we find ourselves in the State, and especially for the interests of the good people of Rivers State to have their ongoing matters in Court without interruptions.”

    Roberts noted that there is a prescribed procedure for handling issues of such stance, noting that any complaints against any judicial officer is handled by the National Judicial Council, NJC.

    He noted that the Judiciary should not be intimidated or bullied by the bidding of any other arm of government, advocating for the use of democratic process and rule of law to resolve the political war in the state.

    Roberts said: “Every action in the Public Service has a prescribed procedure which alI should respect and observe to forestall chaos and anarchy in the State. In the case of the Judiciary, any complaint against one of its officers is dealt with by the National Judicial Council (NJC), which alone has the authority to carry out any disciplinary action or authorize any investigation against any Judge.

    “The need for the protection of the Judiciary cannot be overemphasized, as the Judiciary remains the last hope of the common man, and indeed everyone, including politicians. We continue to appeal to all contenders to sheath their swords and genuinely seek peace in the interest of Rivers State and the economy of Nigeria at large.”

  • NBA Calls for End to Illegal Detentions, Extrajudicial Killings

    NBA Calls for End to Illegal Detentions, Extrajudicial Killings

    The President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Afam Osigwe (SAN), has raised concerns over the worsening security situation in the South-East region, citing widespread illegal detentions, extrajudicial killings, and human rights violations. In an interview in Enugu, Osigwe expressed alarm over the breakdown of law and order in the area.

    “The security challenges in the South-East demand urgent and serious attention. Many communities no longer have functional local government structures, police stations have been destroyed, kidnappings for ransom are rampant, and these issues are increasingly being normalized,” he stated.

    Osigwe criticized the practice of magistrates without proper jurisdiction issuing remand orders, which often result in prolonged and unjust detentions. He revealed that over 68% of prison inmates nationwide are awaiting trial, with many spending more time in detention than they would have if convicted.

    “We strongly condemn the arbitrary detention of individuals without trial. We have urged Chief Judges to ensure that magistrates’ courts do not issue remand orders without setting a return date for review. No one should be detained indefinitely without being formally charged in court. Magistrates without jurisdiction must stop granting indefinite remand orders,” he emphasized.

    Osigwe called on Chief Judges to instruct magistrates to refrain from remanding suspects without promptly charging them to court. He also encouraged victims of unlawful detention to seek legal redress, assuring them that NBA lawyers are ready to provide pro bono services to support such cases.

    “Victims of unjust detention have the right to sue the state for holding them without trial. While we cannot instigate legal action, we encourage those who feel aggrieved to approach lawyers. Many NBA members are willing to offer free legal services to assist them,” he added.

    The NBA President further highlighted the association’s efforts to promote peace and security in the South-East through constructive engagement with relevant agencies and advocacy initiatives. He stressed the importance of collaboration to restore order and protect the rights of citizens in the region.

  • LeBron James becomes NBA record scorer with 50,000 career points

    LeBron James becomes NBA record scorer with 50,000 career points

    LeBron James became the first player in NBA history to score 50,000 career points on Tuesday, extending his lead as the league’s all-time record scorer by reaching a milestone tally that may never be surpassed, AFP reports.

    The Los Angeles Lakers superstar went into the game against the New Orleans Pelicans with 49,999 regular and postseason points after a 17-point performance in Sunday’s win over the Los Angeles Clippers.

    It did not take long for the 40-year-old NBA icon to get the solitary point needed to reach the 50,000-point barrier.

    James, who is in dazzling form in the 22nd season of a glittering career, gathered a pass from Luka Doncic and unfurled a sublime 25-foot three-pointer to move to 50,002 points with the Crypto.com Arena crowd roaring their acclaim.

    James had passed Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s previous all-time regular-season scoring record of 38,387 points in 2023 – itself a record that had stood for 39 years.

    James is now nearly 6,000 points clear of Abdul-Jabbar’s total career points tally of 44,149, with Karl Malone third (41,689 points) and the late Kobe Bryant fourth with 39,283 points.

    Michael Jordan is fifth on the all-time scoring list with 38,279.

    Among active NBA players, only Kevin Durant with just over 35,000 points – roughly 15,000 points behind James – makes the top 10.

  • NBA condemns Benue Assembly’s resolution on Chief Judge’s removal

    NBA condemns Benue Assembly’s resolution on Chief Judge’s removal

    The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has strongly criticised the Benue State House of Assembly’s resolution that directed Governor Hyacinth Alia to remove Justice Maurice Ikpambwese as the state’s Chief Judge.

    In a statement on Wednesday jointly signed by its president, Afam Osigwe (SAN), and general secretary, Mobolaji Ojibara, the NBA described the resolution as unconstitutional and an affront to judicial independence.

    The NBA emphasised that no state assembly has the authority to remove a Chief Judge without the involvement of the National Judicial Council (NJC). The association asserted that any attempt to bypass constitutional procedures is unlawful and a direct attack on the rule of law.

    “The removal of a judicial officer, especially one occupying the esteemed position of Chief Judge, must adhere strictly to due process as outlined in our Constitution. Any deviation from this process is a direct affront to the rule of law and poses a significant threat to our democracy,” the NBA stated.

    The association condemned the assembly’s actions, stating that they set a dangerous precedent that could erode public confidence in legal institutions and undermine the separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. It stressed that the judiciary must operate without external pressures to maintain its impartiality and effectiveness.

    Citing Sections 153 and 271 of the 1999 Constitution, the NBA reaffirmed that the NJC holds exclusive authority over the appointment and removal of judicial officers. It further referenced Section 292(1)(a)(ii), which mandates an NJC investigation, hearing and recommendation before any removal can be considered.

    The NBA noted that the absence of an NJC investigation, hearing and recommendation renders the purported removal of Justice Ikpambwese unconstitutional, null and void.

    The NBA called on the Benue State House of Assembly to immediately rescind its decision, urging elected officials to refrain from arbitrary actions that undermine the judiciary. Additionally, it directed lawyers in the state to boycott any court presided over by a judge who assumes the role of Acting Chief Judge under these circumstances.

    “The arbitrary removal of judicial officers without adherence to due process is unacceptable and will be met with unwavering opposition from the legal community,” the statement concluded.

    The association also urged law enforcement agencies to ensure that Justice Ikpambwese is not hindered in carrying out his constitutional duties, warning that any deviation from the rule of law would be vigorously challenged.

  • NBA apprehends fake lawyer impersonating its member

    NBA apprehends fake lawyer impersonating its member

    In its bid to rid the profession of quacks, vigilant members of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) Udu Branch, Delta State led by David Omage Esq and others yesterday apprehended a fake lawyer, Olubuwe Ossai Silas, who has been impersonating Barr Simon Sabuke.

    Vanguard reports that Silas was caught red-handed at a business centre at Orugbo plaza, Ovwian, while transplanting a scanned lawyer’s seal on a document and preparing legal documents using lawyers’ names.

    He was quickly apprehended while attempting to fight the lawyers, who overpowered him and called in police from the Ovwian Police Division.

    Celebrating the feat, the Chairman of the NBA Udu Branch, Edmund Odohisi, noted that he had reported the incident and filed a formal complaint at the Ovwian Police Station, where Silas is currently cooling off.

    According to Odohisi, “The Divisional Police Officer has assured that the case will be thoroughly investigated and used to deter others who engage in similar acts.

    “This incident highlights the NBA’s zero-tolerance policy towards quacks and infiltrators in the legal profession. As Odohisi emphasized, The full length of the law must be exhausted in this instance.”

    “The NBA Udu Branch has been proactive in addressing impersonation issues, previously warning against the unlawful use of NBA car stickers by non-lawyers.

    “With this latest development, the branch reinforces its commitment to upholding the integrity of the legal profession.” The Chairman added.

    Simon Sabuke, Esq., in a chat with Vanguard, said that a senior lawyer called him to come urgently because someone was impersonating him.

    “When I got there, I saw three of my senior Colleagues with another man. They asked him if he knew me, but he said no; they now told him that I was Simon Sabuke.

    “He attempted to fight Omage, but we overpowered him and called the police, who came to take him away.” Sabuke narrated.