Category: News

  • Gaza civil defence says 13 killed in Israeli strikes overnight

    Gaza civil defence says 13 killed in Israeli strikes overnight

    Gaza’s civil defence agency said Wednesday that 13 people had been killed in Israeli air strikes on the Palestinian territory since midnight.

    Israel “carried out several air strikes… which resulted in the deaths of 13 people and wounded dozens, including women and children, in Khan Yunes and Gaza City”, Mahmud Bassal, spokesman for the agency, told AFP.

    Israel on Tuesday launched its most intense strikes on the Gaza Strip since a January 19 ceasefire between it and Palestinian militants Hamas ended more than 15 months of war.

    The bombardments, which came after the collapse of talks on extending the truce, killed more than 400 people, the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory said.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned late Tuesday that the strikes were “only the beginning” and that future negotiations with Hamas “will take place only under fire”.

    “Hamas has already felt the strength of our arm in the past 24 hours. And I want to promise you –- and them –- this is only the beginning,” he said in a video statement.

    Netanyahu’s office also said early Wednesday that the Israeli government had “unanimously approved” his proposal to reappoint far-right politician Itamar Ben Gvir as national security minister.

    Ben Gvir had resigned in protest over the January 19 ceasefire agreement, which his Jewish Power party called a “capitulation to Hamas”.

    Israel has vowed to keep fighting until the return of all the hostages seized by the Palestinian militants during the October 2023 attack on Israel that sparked the war.

    Hamas has not responded militarily so far, but in a statement it urged friendly countries to “pressure” the United States to bring to an end the strikes by its ally Israel.

  • Trump removes Democrats from US Federal Trade Commission

    Trump removes Democrats from US Federal Trade Commission

    The only two Democrats on the US Federal Trade Commission have been fired by President Donald Trump, the White House said, opening the door for the Republican to appoint loyalists at the independent regulatory agency.

    The FTC’s primary function is to protect the US public against deceptive or unfair business practices.

    Speaking on condition of anonymity, a White House official confirmed that FTC commissioners Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter were dismissed.

    The FTC consists of five commissioners, typically representing both major political parties.

    “The president just illegally fired me,” Bedoya wrote in a post on X, formerly Twitter. “This is corruption plain and simple.”

    Bedoya vowed in an X post to “see the president in court” over the dismissal.

    Layoffs of federal workers have been rampant since Trump took office in January and established a “Department of Government Efficiency” headed by billionaire Elon Musk, a senior advisor and key financial backer of the Republican’s campaign.

    “The FTC is an independent agency founded 111 years ago to fight fraudsters and monopolists,” Bedoya said in a post. “Now, the president wants the FTC to be a lapdog for his golfing buddies.”

    Under Trump and former president Joe Biden, the FTC has taken on Apple, Amazon, Google, and Facebook parent Meta over how they wield market power.

    In an interview with Fox Business in February, newly appointed FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson confirmed that ongoing cases against Amazon and Meta would proceed, emphasizing his commitment to “holding Big Tech’s feet to the fire.”

    Questions have lingered, however, on whether the Trump presidency will continue with the cases, given an apparent alignment between tech billionaires and the Republican since he won last year’s election.

    Since that victory, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has made major changes at his company to bring it in line with Trump’s preferences. He has axed US fact-checking on Facebook, named Trump ally Dana White to Meta’s board and appointed a Republican advisor as head of global policy.

    Amazon boss Jeff Bezos visited the president during the transition period and has sought to make his Washington Post newspaper less hostile to the president.

    The billionaire has ordered the Post’s opinion section not to run columns opposed to “personal liberties and free markets,” and quashed its planned endorsement of Democrat Kamala Harris before the US election.

    Musk, Bezos and other tech billionaires were given prominent places at Trump’s inauguration in January, with several making million-dollar donations to the committee organizing the event.

  • US judge suspends ban on transgender people in military

    US judge suspends ban on transgender people in military

    A US federal judge on Tuesday suspended the Trump administration’s ban on transgender people serving in the military, citing the principle of equality and dealing a blow — if only temporary — to the US president’s agenda.

    Referencing the US Declaration of Independence, which states that all humans are “created equal,” Judge Ana C. Reyes suspended President Donald Trump’s late January order that excluded transgender people from the armed forces.

    That suspension, however, will be put on pause until March 21 to give the government time to file an emergency stay at a higher court, according to Reyes’ decision.

    The order will nonetheless come as a blow to Trump’s administration, which has made it a priority to strip protections for minorities since he took office.

    Trump’s January 27 executive order stated that “expressing a false ‘gender identity’ divergent from an individual’s sex cannot satisfy the rigorous standards necessary for military service.”

    Since taking office, he has also declared that the US government will only recognize two sexes — male and female — that “are not changeable.”

    The number of transgender people in the US military is estimated at about 15,000 out of around two million.

    Reyes’s order used unusually strong language in parts to criticize the order banning transgender Americans from serving in the military.

    “The Military Ban is soaked in animus and dripping with pretext,” the judge wrote. “Its language is unabashedly demeaning, its policy stigmatizes transgender persons as inherently unfit, and its conclusions bear no relation to fact.”

    The judge said Trump “could have crafted a policy that balances the Nation’s need for a prepared military and Americans’ right to equal protection. They still can. The Military Ban, however, is not that policy.”

    In February, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a memo preventing transgender people from joining the military and halting gender transition treatment for others who are already in uniform.

    The Pentagon has also said it would begin removing transgender troops from the military unless they obtain a waiver on a case-by-case basis, according to a February memo.

    The US military lifted a ban on transgender troops in 2016, during Democrat Barack Obama’s second term as president — but policies have seesawed under his successors Trump, Joe Biden and now Trump again.

    Transgender issues have roiled US politics in recent years, as states controlled by Democrats and Republicans have moved in opposite directions on policies ranging from medical treatment to what books on the topic are allowed in public or school libraries.

    Tuesday’s order was in a case brought by a group of transgender people, either in the military or wishing to become so, to challenge Trump’s latest executive order.

  • Brazil legend Romario demands ‘cards for cash’ probe against Paqueta’s uncle

    Brazil legend Romario demands ‘cards for cash’ probe against Paqueta’s uncle

    Former Brazil World Cup winner Romario, now an anti-corruption lawmaker, on Tuesday demanded an investigation into an alleged ‘cards for cash’ scandal involving the uncle of West Ham star Lucas Paqueta.

    Romario, a senator in the country’s upper house, is the man behind a parliamentary commission report into betting patterns in football

    According to the document Paqueta’s uncle, Bruno Tolentino is on a list of suspicious gamblers.

    He is suspected of making money from bets on cards received by his nephew and another Brazil player Luiz Henrique when he played at Spanish club Real Betis.

    “The eyes of our society can’t be turned away,” Romario, a 1994 World Cup winner, said.

    The report says the commission has seen bank documents showing Tolentino allegedly paying Henrique 30,000 reais ($5,200) in February 2023 to arrange for him to receive a yellow card in a Liga match against Villarreal.

    On the same day of that match, Paqueta also received a yellow card in a Premier League match against Aston Villa.

    The two players have protested their innocence, and had been asked to testify before the commission, but failed to appear.

    Earlier this month, reports in Britain claimed 27-year-old Paqueta was facing a Football Association hearing into alleged spot-fixing.

    Paqueta is said to have deliberately got himself booked four times in Premier League matches for betting purposes.

    The FA is reported to be pushing for a lifetime ban for Paqueta if he is found guilty.

  • International Women’s Day celebration, by Afe Babalola

    International Women’s Day celebration, by Afe Babalola

    In the 1930s parents put a premium on the number of children they had. Hence, polygamy was the order of the day. The reason was that the more children they had, the more hands would be available to help on the farm. The only occupation then was farming. I believe this was one of the reasons why polygamy was the order of the day.

    When as a young adult, I was admitted into infant class at Emmanuel School, Ado-Ekiti in 1937, we were 25 in number. There were only five girls amongst us and only one completed the eight years programme leading to the primary six certificate.

    Discrimination against women in Nigeria

    The common saying was that there was no need to educate a woman because at the end of the day, she would end up in the kitchen. That was understandable because at that time, the main duty of a woman was to help the husband on the farm and cook for the family.

    A new era

    Since then, many changes have taken place. In ABUAD today, girls outnumber boys. Most interestingly, during convocation ceremonies, those who come up with the first class in all courses are women in the ratio of about nine girls to one boy. I once thought I should change the university to a girls’ university. The Vice-Chancellor, the Registrar, and the Librarian are women and perform very well.

    Since the late 19th Century, there has been a movement in civilized countries to form a world organization to fight for women’s rights which today is known as International Women’s Day.

    The first National Women’s Day

    The origins of IWD can be traced back to the United States, where the Socialist Party of America organized the first National Woman’s Day on February 28, 1909. This event was held in New York City and was aimed at advocating for equal rights for women, including suffrage. It was a response to the growing discontent among women, particularly those working in the garment industry, who were subjected to harsh working conditions, low wages, and discrimination.

    The Internationalisation of Women’s Day

    The idea to make the day international came from Clara Zetkin, a German socialist and advocate for women’s rights. In August 1910, at the International Socialist Women’s Conference held in Copenhagen, Zetkin proposed the establishment of an International Women’s Day. Her proposal was met with unanimous approval from the over 100 women from 17 countries present at the conference, representing unions, socialist parties, and working women’s clubs. Zetkin’s proposal did not specify a date, but the idea was to promote equal rights, including suffrage, for women worldwide.

    The first International Women’s Day

    The first International Women’s Day was observed on March 19, 1911, in Austria, Denmark, Germany, and Switzerland, with rallies and organised meetings that attracted thousands of women. These events focused on women’s rights to work, vote, be trained, hold public office, and end discrimination. Notably, less than a week after the first IWD, the tragic Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire in New York City brought further attention to the critical need for labour reforms and safety standards in the United States, highlighting the dire conditions many working women faced.

    The date becomes official

    In 1913 and 1914, International Women’s Day began to be observed on March 8, a date that has been officially maintained since. The choice of March 8 has various explanations, but it is widely recognised for its association with women’s activism in Russia in 1917, when women striking for “bread and peace” in response to World War I initiated a series of events that led to the abdication of the Tsar and the granting of the right to vote to Russian women.

    The origins of International Women’s Day are rooted in the struggle for women’s rights and labour rights, reflecting a broader movement for social justice and equality. Over the years, IWD has evolved from a day of protest and demand for the franchise to a global celebration of women’s achievements and a continuing call for gender equality.

    IWD in the early years

    The early years of International Women’s Day, IWD, are marked by a blend of activism, struggle, and the burgeoning movement towards gender equality and women’s rights. Following its establishment, IWD became a focal point for women around the world to unite in their demands for fair treatment, the right to vote, better working conditions, and equality. This period was characterized by significant events and milestones that laid the groundwork for future advancements in women’s rights.

    Early 20th Century activism

    In the years following its first observance, International Women’s Day was closely tied to the labor movements sweeping across Europe and North America. Women laborers were at the forefront, advocating for shorter work hours, better pay, and the right to unionize. The textile and garment industries, in particular, saw significant participation from women, who often worked in poor conditions for minimal wages.

    IWD gains international recognition

    Throughout the 1910s and 1920s, International Women’s Day grew in prominence and was celebrated by an increasing number of countries. It became a day not only to advocate for labour rights but also to push for women’s suffrage, education, and the right to hold public office. The Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917 saw women gaining unprecedented rights, and March 8 was declared a national holiday in Soviet Russia, further elevating the day’s significance.

    Education

    I want to take this opportunity to appeal to the government on this International Women’s Day celebration that women should fight for their rightful place in politics. The question on the lips of everybody is why do women not play more active roles in politics.

    Recently in Nigeria, the National Assemblies rejected the Gender Equality Bill, which Princess Grace Adejoh, a columnist, called “an astronomical apolitical stance and aberration against, as well as a separation of Nigerian women participating in politics, which is academically, legislatively, constitutionally, statutorily, and actorally reprehensible to say the least”. Nyesom Wike, a former governor of Rivers State, also criticized the rejection, calling it a significant setback for the nation’s democratic development.

    The need to draft a constitution that will guarantee equity, fairness, and justice to all Nigerians was one of the outstanding recommendations made at the National Conference, which President Goodluck Jonathan called in 2014. After realising that the current constitutional protections are not entirely effective in preventing discrimination based on sex, religion, or ethnicity, the recommendation was made in light of the need to ensure that Nigerians of all backgrounds participate equally in every aspect of the country’s endeavours. It is clear today that women still face a lot of discrimination, particularly when it comes to their involvement in politics. I will, therefore, continue to address this issue, which continues to be of great concern to all Nigerians, including women, who are outraged by the few opportunities that women have to effectively engage in politics in Nigeria.

    Compulsory education for women

    Regrettably, some religions do not permit women to go to school or university. I believe it is our duty to fight for United Nation’s order that it is compulsory that all women should be allowed to go to school, no matter their religion. Women should fight for the review of all laws, customs or practices that forbid women from participating in politics or forbid children from going to .school

  • Breaking: Bill mandating physical offices for bloggers scales second reading

    Breaking: Bill mandating physical offices for bloggers scales second reading

    ABUJA- A bill that seeks to amend the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023, to require social media platforms to establish physical offices within the country has scaled second reading in the Senate.

    The bill, titled ‘ A Bill for an Act to Amend the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023, to Mandate the Establishment of Physical Offices within the Territorial Boundaries of the Federal Republic of Nigeria by Social Media Platforms, and for Related Matters, 2025 (SB. 650),” was sponsored by Senator Ned Munir Nwokom APC, Delta North.

    The President of the Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio then referred it to the senate committee on ICT and cyber security to report back in 2 months.

    In his lead debate on the general principles of the bill, Senator Nwoko explained that Nigeria as Africa’s most populous nation with over 220 million people has a significant digital presence, ranking first in Africa and second globally in terms of social media usage, spending an average of three hours and 46 minutes daily online, according to a Global Web Index report cited by Business Insider Africa.

    He highlighted that despite the high engagement, multinational social media corporations such as Facebook, X, Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube, TikTok, and Snapchat do not maintain physical offices in Nigeria, unlike in other climes.

    Senator Nwoko outlined several challenges resulting from the absence of social media offices in Nigeria, including: Limited local representation; Economic losses as well as Challenges in Legal and Data Protection Compliance.

    The bill also proposes new regulations for bloggers operating in Nigeria as it mandates that all bloggers must establish a verifiable office in any of the capital cities across the country, maintain proper employee records and belong to a recognized national association of bloggers, headquartered in Abuja.

    According to Senator Nwoko, this measure has become imperative in order to promote accountability, transparency, and professionalism in Nigeria’s digital media space, similar to traditional media houses, just as he asserts that the bill is not an attack on social media platforms but a demand for equity and respect for Nigeria’s position as a global leader in digital engagement.

    Senator Nwoko said, “I rise this day to lead the debate on a matter that is not only of national importance but is also central to Nigeria’s sovereignty, economy, and technological development. The Bill before us, “A Bill for an Act to Alter the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023, LFN, to Mandate the Establishment of Physical Offices within the Territorial Boundaries of the Federal Republic of Nigeria by Social Media Platforms, and for Related Matters, 2024”, seeks to correct a glaring omission in how multinational social media companies engage with our country.

    “This Bill was read for the first time on Thursday, November 21, 2024.

    “Our dear nation, Nigeria, is not just the most populous country in Africa; we are also one of the most active when it comes to digital engagement. With over 220 million people, social media has become an essential part of our daily lives. According to the Global Web Index as reported by Business Insider Africa, Nigerians rank first in Africa and second globally in terms of daily social media usage, spending an average of 3 hours and 46 minutes online. Platforms such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, WhatsApp, YouTube, TikTok, and Snapchat have become indispensable to millions of our people. These platforms are not just tools of communication; they are ecosystems that influence our politics, shape public opinion, drive entrepreneurship, and provide avenues for education and entertainment.

    “However, despite the enormous user base and the value generated from Nigerian participation, these multinational corporations have no physical offices in Nigeria. This stands in sharp contrast to their presence in other countries such as the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, India, Singapore, and Australia, where they maintain offices to address regional concerns, manage content policies, and build partnerships.

    ” The absence of physical offices for these social media giants in Nigeria presents major challenges, including: Limited Local Representation: The lack of a local presence creates a disconnect between the platforms and their Nigerian user base. Resolving user complaints, addressing regulatory concerns, or managing content moderation issues specific to Nigeria often takes longer due to the geographical and cultural distance.

    “Missed Economic Opportunities: The absence of physical offices has deprived us of numerous opportunities. Economically, it denies Nigeria the benefits of job creation in areas such as customer service, content moderation, legal compliance, and marketing. Imagine the thousands of young Nigerians who could be employed by these companies, gaining valuable skills and contributing to our economy. Technology transfer is another area where Nigeria stands to benefit immensely. Countries like China and South Korea became leaders in electronics and automobile manufacturing by fostering local partnerships with foreign firms and adapting their technologies. If these social media giants establish a local presence, Nigerian engineers, developers, and tech professionals will have the opportunity to learn from some of the best minds in the world and adapt cutting-edge technologies.

    ” Difficulty in redressal: The legal implications of their absence are equally concerning. Without physical offices in Nigeria, enforcing data protection laws, resolving disputes, and safeguarding user rights becomes a complex process. This Bill seeks to simplify this process by ensuring that these platforms are physically present to respond to the unique needs of their Nigerian users and comply with our laws.

    “The success stories of multinational corporations that have established a presence in Nigeria should serve as an example. Companies like MTN, Shell, Chevron, Nestlé, and Total have not only thrived in our market but have also enriched our workforce through job creation, training, and partnerships.

    “This Bill, therefore, is not an attack on these platforms. It is a call for equity and fairness. It is a demand for respect and recognition of Nigeria’s status as a global leader in digital engagement.

    “In furtherance of our commitment to a structured and accountable digital space, this Bill also mandates that all bloggers operating in Nigeria must establish a verifiable office in any of the capital cities across the country. They must keep proper records of their employees and belong to a recognized national association of bloggers, which shall have its headquarters in Abuja.

    “We cannot continue to have a situation where individuals operate anonymously, spreading information sometimes false without any structure or accountability. Just like traditional media houses, bloggers must be properly registered and regulated to ensure professionalism, transparency, and responsibility in their operations.

    “It is a bold step towards ensuring that Nigeria’s digital space is not only vibrant but also fair and just for all stakeholders.”

  • Rivers police confirm fire incident on Trans-Niger Pipeline, arrest two

    Rivers police confirm fire incident on Trans-Niger Pipeline, arrest two

    PORT HARCOURT: Rivers State Police Command has confirmed the fire incident on the Trans-Niger Delta Pipeline, but quickly assured residents of safety.

    While confirming that the facility is operated by the Shell Petroleum Development Company, SPDC, the police mentioned that two people have been arrested for questioning over the development.

    The command noted that the incident happened Monday night, assuring that the situation had been brought under control.

    The Police Public Relations Officer of the state command, Grace Iringe-Koko, a Superintendent of Police, who disclosed this in a statement on Tuesday, did not note if the development was caused by a militant group.

    Iringe-Koko, in the statement, also did not mention if the fire was caused by an explosion or a spill that later got burnt.

    She stated that a surveillance team in the area observed the fire incident and reported to the operators, adding that there was no further threat.

    She said: “The Rivers State Police Command wishes to inform the general public that a fire incident occurred at the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) operated Trans Niger Delta Pipeline, located at the border of Kpor and Bodo communities.

    “During a routine night patrol, security operatives observed the incident and promptly alerted SPDC management.

    “The latter initiated necessary safety protocols, including shutting down the affected pipeline. As a result of swift intervention, the situation is now under control, and there is no further threat to residents or the environment.”

    Iringe-Koko, however, disclosed that police have opened investigation into the incident to determine the cause of the fire, adding that two people have been arrested for interrogation.

    “The Rivers State Police Command has commenced a thorough investigation to determine the cause of the fire. In connection with this, two individuals have been taken in for questioning as part of efforts to uncover any potential act of sabotage.

    “The Command remains committed to ensuring that perpetrators of criminal activities are identified and brought to justice.

    “We urge residents to remain calm and vigilant, assuring them of our unwavering commitment to protecting lives and property. The Command will not relent in its efforts to rid the state of criminal elements and maintain peace and security for all,” she added.

  • NYSC member, Raye, apologises for calling Lagos ‘smelling state’

    NYSC member, Raye, apologises for calling Lagos ‘smelling state’

    A National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) member based in Lagos, Ushie Uguamaye, popularly known as Raye, has issued an apology for describing Lagos as a “smelling state”.

    Raye recently posted a video on TikTok where she criticised President Bola Tinubu over the country’s economic situation and also lamented the environmental condition of Nigeria’s most populous city.

    The video went viral, generating reactions even from NYSC officials.

    However, Raye wrote in an Instagram post on Monday that she regretted her remarks about Lagos, acknowledging that her words may have offended residents.

    Raye admitted that her choice of language may have been insensitive and clarified that she never intended to insult those who call Lagos home.

    She said her comments were based on personal observations as someone new to the city.

    The corps member explained that her controversial statement was part of a broader initiative—a 30-day “rant challenge” designed to shed light on Nigeria’s pressing social and economic issues.

    Her goal, she said, was to spark conversations and bring attention to the country’s deepening financial struggles.

    “I want to first of all state that I am sorry to the people who were born and raised in Lagos State if you feel offended by what I said. I am sorry,” she wrote.

    “But as a visitor here, I could tell there was a difference in the atmosphere and quality of air here. If the way that I put it triggered your emotions and the love for your birth state, I am sorry. I didn’t mean to talk down on your birth state.”

    Raye further revealed that her original plan was to post 20 videos addressing various societal concerns, hoping to gain traction by the 20th day. However, her first video unexpectedly went viral, resonating with many Nigerians who share similar frustrations.

    She also highlighted the financial difficulties faced by young Nigerians, pointing out that despite working over 45 hours a week, she and many others still struggle to afford simple leisure activities.

    “When I started the 30-day rant challenge, I said I just wanted to be heard. I believed that if I got to DAY-20 people would begin to hear me and join me to speak to the government,” she explained.

    “My target was to make at least 20 videos complaining until I was heard. Lucky for me, I didn’t even have to get to DAY 2 because a lot of us were actually angry, and Day 1 of the challenge was enough for people to join me.”

    She continued, “I want better for myself. (And I hope you do too). The complaints I made are valid regardless of whatever ‘lifestyle’ you think I am living.

    “I work 45+ hours a week and I should be able to afford hanging out with my friends every weekend. However, I can’t. But how many of us can actually afford to hang out with our friends? How many can afford that in reality? You spend all week working and can’t even feel alive during the weekends.”

    Raye urged Nigerians to remain focused on demanding better living conditions rather than getting sidetracked by momentary controversies.

    “I encourage all of us to ask for what we believe we deserve. I know distractions will take us again, very soon. But if we stay committed to asking for better we will get better,” she added.

    TodayPriceNG News

  • CP orders investigation into police brutality, extortion allegations by AkwaPoly students

    CP orders investigation into police brutality, extortion allegations by AkwaPoly students

    UYO –THE Commissioner of Police in Akwa Ibom state, Baba Mohammed Azare has ordered an investigation into Police brutality and extortion alleged by the students of Akwa Ibom State Polytechnic Ikot Osurua, in Ikot Ekpene local government area

    The Police Public Relations Officer, DSP Timfon John who made this known yesterday in a statement, said the CP gave the order Monday when he engaged the student leaders and management of the School in his office in Uyo.

    Her words, “The Commissioner of Police, Akwa Ibom State Command, CP Baba Mohammed Azare, fsi, has ordered a comprehensive investigation into allegations of police brutality and extortion raised by students of Akwa Ibom State Polytechnic, Ikot Osurua.

    “In a bid to address their concerns, the Commissioner of Police engaged the management of the school, Students’ Union Government (SUG) and other representatives in a peaceful dialogue aimed at fostering understanding and strengthening police-student relations.

    “During the engagement, the Command reaffirmed its uncompromising dedication to upholding human rights and ensuring the safety of all citizens, including students.

    “The CP strongly condemned any acts of misconduct by police officers, emphasizing that any personnel found guilty of unprofessional behaviour would face disciplinary measures by the law.

    “He used the occasion to emphasize the need for continuous collaboration between students and law enforcement agencies, encouraging open communication and trust-building efforts to ensure a more secure environment”

    According to the PPRO, the command reassured students that proactive measures were already in place to curb crime and promote security within the host community through intelligence-led operations.

    Recall that AkwaPoly students led by the President of the Student Union Government (SUG) of the School, Comrade Geoffrey George, Monday morning took to the streets of Ikot Ekpene LGA to protest against alleged police brutality, extortion among others.

  • Abia airport project: Nsulu landowners reject govt takeover of 1,025 hectares of land

    Abia airport project: Nsulu landowners reject govt takeover of 1,025 hectares of land

    The landowners in Nsulu, Isialangwa North Local Government Area of Abia State, host to the proposed Abia Airport, have rejected the acquisition of 1,025 hectares of land for the airport project, saying it would have catastrophic consequences on their communities, as the loss of the vast tract of land would lead to insufficient land for farming, housing, and essential needs, ultimately resulting in hunger, starvation, and potential extinction.

    In an open letter to Governor Alex Otti of the state, yesterday, the landowners said: “On land mass, we strongly object to the proposed acquisition of 1,025 hectares of land for the Abia Airport, Nsulu, as it would have catastrophic consequences for our communities. The loss of this vast tract of land would lead to insufficient land for farming, housing, and essential needs, ultimately resulting in hunger, starvation, and potential extinction.
    “Furthermore, the proposed land acquisition would exacerbate existing socio-economic challenges, increasing poverty, unemployment, and insecurity. Our communities would be left with reduced space for new homes, burial grounds, and community development, threatening our very way of life.

    “In comparison, nearby airports such as Owerri, Ebonyi, and Enugu occupy between 250-360 hectares. In similar light, Abia State can learn from the design of Ninoy Aquino International Airport, MIAA, in Manila, Philippines, for example, which handles 48 million passengers annually and was built on 440 hectares. It has 4 terminal buildings, 7 hangar bays and a runway of 6km!

    “Considering these concerns, we propose negotiating a land size of not more than 400 hectares for the airport. This compromise would balance the needs of the airport with the livelihoods and well-being of our communities.”
    Further, they said: “Transparency and map coordinates. We respectfully request that the government provide us with the claim survey of the entire proposed acquisition and the coordinates and their control points. This information is crucial for us to understand the land requirements of the proposed airport design and its potential impact on our individual communities.

    “The lack of transparency and the government’s forceful attempts to acquire our land have created distrust and raised concerns about the government’s intentions from the outset. We believe that providing this information is essential for building trust and ensuring that our communities are informed and engaged throughout the process.
    “Representation. We take great exception to the government’s decision to appoint representatives for our host communities without our consent. This action disregards our autonomy and agency, and we strongly believe that we should be allowed to choose our own representatives to ensure our voices are heard.

    “The current arrangement, where landowners are appointed to negotiate with themselves, is not only incongruous but also undermines the legitimacy of the process. Furthermore, we are dismayed that some village representatives were unknown to the landowners they claimed to represent, and the government’s inaction when brought to their attention only exacerbates our concerns about accountability and transparency.

    “We urge the government to recognise our right to self-representation and decision-making, and to engage in meaningful dialogue with us to address our concerns.

    “Other projects: We restate that we do not have a problem with the airport project itself, but we oppose the government’s plan to site a hotel, housing estate, and school on our land for commercial purposes. We do not believe that these projects fall under the much touted “overriding public interest” that will necessitate a forceful acquisition of our land. We have offered suggestions to your government on alternative viable options.

    “Court order: We demand that the government respect the court order to stay further action on the airport project pending the hearing and determination of our suit. The government’s continued actions on the project, despite the court order, undermine the rule of law and create a perception that the state is above the law. We urge the government to uphold the principles of law and order, and to adhere to the court’s directives, just as it expects its citizens to do.”