Category: Economy

  • Bayelsa not a single-economy state, says govt

    Bayelsa not a single-economy state, says govt

    The Bayelsa State Government has denied claims that the state is a mono-product economy.

    According to the government, Bayelsa is richly endowed with numerous natural resources, including fish and arable land capable of producing rice, palm oil, plantain, and several other crops in commercial quantities.

    The Deputy Governor of the state, Sen. Lawrence Ewhrudjakpo, stated this during a courtesy visit by a delegation from NEXIM Bank, led by its South-South Regional Head, Soni Oseghale, at Government House, Yenagoa, on Thursday.

    Ewhrudjakpo expressed the government’s readiness to partner with the Nigerian Export-Import Bank to harness the state’s non-oil and gas resources for export.

    He said the bank’s objective aligns with the Assured Prosperity Agenda of Governor Douye Diri’s administration.

    The Deputy Governor maintained that the state has a comparative advantage in aquaculture and fisheries, calling on NEXIM Bank to leverage its wealth of experience and expertise to help Bayelsa maximize its natural resources for export.

    Earlier in his remarks, Oseghale said the team was in Bayelsa to collaborate with the state government in identifying non-oil resources available in commercial quantities that could be exploited and harnessed for export.

  • Naira depreciates to N1,505/$ in parallel market

    Naira depreciates to N1,505/$ in parallel market

    The Naira today depreciated to N1,505 per dollar in the parallel market from N1,495 per dollar on Thursday.

    Similarly,  the Naira  depreciated to  N1,500 per dollar in the Nigerian Foreign Exchange Market (NFEM)

    Dat published by the Central  Bank of Nigeria, CBN, showed that the indicative exchange rate for the naira rose to N1,500 per dollar from N1,496 per dollar on Thursday, indicating N4 depreciation for the naira.

    Consequently, the margin between the parallel market and NFEM rate widened to N5 per dollar from N1 per dollaar the previous day.

  • Nigeria loses $56bn to malnutrition annually — FG

    Nigeria loses $56bn to malnutrition annually — FG

    The Federal government says Nigeria loses about $56 billion annually to malnutrition.

    Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Sen. Abubakar Atiku Bagudu, disclosed this at the end of a recent high-level dialogue in Abuja on the cost of inaction on malnutrition in Nigeria and N4G commitment-making.

    The minister, who was represented at the event by the Permanent Secretary, Dr. Vitalis Obi, said malnutrition has the enormous economic cost of malnutrition, estimated at USD 56 billion annually, equivalent to 12.2% of Nigeria’s Gross National Income (GNI).

    The Federal Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning (FMBEP) organized the meeting in collaboration with Global Affairs Canada and Nutrition International. Representatives from various stakeholders, including the office of the Vice President, relevant Ministries, and international organizations, attended.

    Stakeholders in nutrition who gathered at the event reaffirmed their commitments to advance nutrition in Nigeria in line with the federal government’s N774 Initiative.

    The stakeholders identified challenges such as inadequate funding, weak food systems, and climate change as major factors that promote malnutrition in Nigeria.

    In a communiqué issued at the end of the dialogue, the stakeholders highlighted a myriad of challenges in addressing malnutrition and improving nutrition outcomes in the country. These include inadequate funding and budget implementation, weak food systems and poor diet diversity, climate change, social, cultural and behavioral patterns, data gaps and monitoring challenges, in addition to food insecurity.

    The Stakeholders resolved to align across all sectors to ensure that food security and malnutrition policies, strategies, guidelines and tools synergistically address malnutrition in all its forms by 2026.

    The meeting agreed to establish and operationalize nutrition departments with dedicated budget lines across 12 Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) by 2028 to improve the management and coordination of nutrition actions at both national and subnational levels.

    The Stakeholders resolved to establish and operationalize a transformative nutrition investment fund to catalyze nationwide implementation of nutrition actions towards universal health coverage for all Nigerians by 2028.

    The stakeholders decided to prioritize the implementation of the minimum package of nutrition services at the Primary Health Care (PHC) level as a component of the Sector-Wide Approach (SWAP), driving tangible improvements in health and well-being.

    They also resolved to expand access to social safety-net programs and water and sanitation (WASH) programs to empower vulnerable individuals and families, enable them to afford nutritionally diverse diets and end open defecation among all Nigerians.

    The Hon. Minister of Budget and Economic Planning, Sen. Abubakar Atiku Bagudu, decried the enormous economic cost of malnutrition on the Nigerian economy, which is estimated at USD 56 billion annually, equivalent to about 12.2% of the country’s Gross National Income (GNI).

    The Minister was ably represented at the meeting by the Permanent Secretary of FMBEP, Dr. Emeka Vitalis Obi mni.
    The meeting held discussions on the upcoming Nutrition for Growth conference scheduled for March 2025 in Paris, France.

    The meeting’s stakeholders included the office of the Vice President, relevant Ministries, representatives of the National Assembly, States, Nutrition International, Global Affairs Canada, UNICEF, GAIN, CS-SUNN, and GIZ.

    The meeting served as a platform for Nigeria to articulate a common position ahead of the global nutrition summit in France later in March.

  • Breaking: Tinubu signs N54.99trn 2025 Budget into law

    Breaking: Tinubu signs N54.99trn 2025 Budget into law

    ABUJA – President Bola Tinubu has signed the 2025 Appropriation Bill of ₦54.99 trillion into law.

    The signing ceremony took place on Friday at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, in the presence of the leadership of the National Assembly and other senior government officials.

    The budget was passed by both chambers of the National Assembly on Thursday, February 13, after lawmakers increased it from the initial ₦49.7 trillion submitted by the President.

    The 2025 Appropriation Act represents a 99.96% increase from the 2024 budget of ₦27.5 trillion.

    2025 Budget breakdown:

    Total Expenditure: ₦54.99 trillion

    Statutory Transfers: ₦3.65 trillion

    Recurrent (Non-Debt) Expenditure: ₦13.64 trillion

    Capital Expenditure: ₦23.96 trillion

    Debt Servicing: ₦14.32 trillion

    Deficit-to-GDP Ratio: 1.52%

    This budget marks a significant fiscal expansion, with increased allocations for capital projects and debt servicing.

  • Nigerians displaced as rents double in inflation-hit Lagos

    Nigerians displaced as rents double in inflation-hit Lagos

    Nigeria’s economic crisis is hitting renters in Lagos hard as landlords pass down the costs of spiralling inflation — pushing residents further out, upending children’s education and adding to workers’ already infamous commutes.

    With a population of more than 20 million, the country’s sprawling, ever-growing economic capital has for years struggled to keep up with housing demand, with some 3,000 people added to its population per day.

    But government-led economic reforms, including the floating of the naira currency and the removal of a fuel subsidy, have sent a shock through the economy.

    In a city that scions of oil wealth, a solid middle class and millions of informal workers all call home, rents are spiking on both Lagos’ richer islands and the cheaper — and poorer — mainland.

    “I might just have to find a way to plead with my landlord,” said Yemisi Odusanya, a 40-year-old cookbook author and food blogger.

    After giving birth to twins last year, she’s doubtful she can find a better deal elsewhere for her family of seven, even after her landlord in Lekki raised the rent 120 percent.

    “I’m planning to pack out,” Bartholomew Idowu, a transportation worker, said emphatically, though he wasn’t sure where he and his children would move.

    The mainland resident’s landlord hit him with a 28-percent rent increase, from 350,000 naira ($232) per year to 450,000 — a significant sum in a country where the GDP per capita is $835.

    – Children changing schools –

    The government recently revised its inflation data, knocking down official year-on-year inflation in January to 24.48 percent, from December’s 34.80 percent figure.

    That’s been of little consolation to ordinary Nigerians.

    “The way out at the moment is to look for a way to pay,” said Dennis Erezi, a journalist, noting that his 31-percent rent increase is still cheaper than moving.

    Related News
    Abuja Continental Hotel prepares for Ramadan, promises lavish iftar experience
    How landmark court case sparked birth of Itsekiri National Congress USA
    Nigerian newspapers review: Obasa storms House with armed men, presides over 4-man faction

    Jimoh Saheed, a personal trainer, had to leave his one-room flat in a middle-class neighbourhood in Ikoyi when his landlord more than doubled his rent to 2.5 million naira a year and a half ago.

    Moving to the mainland meant he was further from his clients and his two children had to change schools and now pay for transport since they no longer live close enough to walk to class.

    Late last year, his new landlord raised his rent by 25 percent.

    “This is affecting me emotionally, it’s affecting me mentally, and in fact, physically,” said the 39-year-old, who said his earnings have not kept up with the pace of inflation despite taking on more work.

    Lawyers say that rent hikes cannot be unilaterally imposed and are supposed to be negotiated between parties.

    But laws are rarely enforced without the threat of a lawsuit, attorney Valerian Nwadike told AFP, noting an uptick in tenant-landlord disputes in the past year.

    – Luxury market –

    The government hopes its economic reforms will eventually pay dividends, but for nearly two years Nigerians have slogged through the worst economic crisis in a generation.

    There are also structural issues at play: high interest rates mean mortgages are out of reach for most, and developers face a bureaucratic regulatory environment, said housing analyst Babatunde Akinpelu.

    Lagos is also home to an outsize number of Nigeria’s jobs — leading to an unending stream of people pouring in.

    Even as cranes and construction sites whir across the city, many new developments are targeted to the high-end market — foreigners, Nigerians in the diaspora or oil sector workers, many of whom earn in dollars.

    The result is a bifurcated housing market, where increased supply in the luxury sector doesn’t trickle down to the rest of the housing stock, said economist Steve Onyeiwu.

    “Most of (Lagos’s) landlords are exposed to dollar-denominated expenses,” like loans or mortgages for properties abroad, even as the naira’s value has collapsed, said a director at Island Shoreline, a property management company, adding his own landlord recently tried to raise his rent 100 percent.

    Improved public transit, such as the new rail line connecting Lagos and Ibadan, might alleviate pressure but for now there’s a “snowball effect” of rising prices, he noted, asking that his name not be used given the sensitivity of rent hikes.

    With leases typically paid up front for anywhere between one and three years, both landlords and renters try to negotiate a good deal to hedge against inflation.

    But the current spike in rents is “alarming,” said real-estate agent Ismail Oriyomi Akinola, noting 200 percent jumps on the wealthy Victoria Island.

    “Good shelter is very key to every individual,” he said. “Not only for the rich.”

  • Record N1.7 Trillion Windfall: FAAC Pours Funds into Government Coffers

    Record N1.7 Trillion Windfall: FAAC Pours Funds into Government Coffers

    The Federation Account Allocation Committee (FAAC) has disbursed a staggering N1.703 trillion to the three tiers of government for February 2025, marking a notable increase from the N1.424 trillion distributed in January. This surge in revenue underscores a dynamic shift in Nigeria’s economic landscape, prompting both optimism and careful consideration of its implications.

    “Gross statutory revenue of N1.848 trillion was received for the month of January 2025. This was higher than the sum of N1.226 trillion received in the month of December 2024 by N622.125 billion,” the official communique stated, highlighting the substantial growth in revenue. This jump, while seemingly positive, raises a crucial question: how will these funds be utilized to foster sustainable economic growth and address pressing societal needs?

    Breaking down the disbursement, the federal government received N552.591 billion, state governments received N590.614 billion, and local government councils received N434.567 billion. Additionally, N125.284 billion was allocated as derivation revenue to oil-producing states. This distribution reflects the intricate balancing act of Nigeria’s fiscal federalism, where revenue sharing is a pivotal mechanism for equitable development.

    The surge in revenue is attributed to increases in both statutory revenue and Value Added Tax (VAT). “Gross revenue of N771.886 billion was available from the Value Added Tax (VAT) in January 2025. This was higher than the N649.561 billion available in the month of December 2024 by N122.325 billion,” the communiqué noted. This rise in VAT collection suggests improved economic activity and potentially enhanced tax compliance.

    Read Also: CBN Begins Profiling LGA Officials for Account Opening, Amidst Autonomy Hurdles

    Numbers alone don’t tell the whole story. What this means for the average Nigerian is crucial. Will this influx of funds translate into improved infrastructure, better healthcare, or increased job opportunities? Or will it merely perpetuate existing patterns of expenditure?

    Consider the implications for state and local governments. With increased funds, they are now presented with a critical opportunity to address local needs, improve service delivery, and stimulate economic activity at the grassroots level. But this also implies a heightened responsibility for transparency and accountability. Public trust hinges on the judicious use of these resources.

    The Electronic Money Transfer Levy (EMTL) also contributed to the revenue pool, with N20.548 billion shared among the tiers of government. This growing reliance on digital transactions signals a shift towards a more digitized economy, which, while promising, also requires robust regulatory frameworks to ensure security and efficiency.

    For many, this news brings a glimmer of hope. It represents the potential for improved living standards, better public services, and a more prosperous future. Yet, it also underscores the persistent challenges of economic management and the need for prudent fiscal policies.

    According to the World Bank, effective public financial management is crucial for achieving sustainable development goals. “Strong public financial management systems can help governments allocate resources efficiently, improve service delivery, and promote economic growth.” This sentiment resonates deeply in the context of Nigeria’s current economic climate.

    As we move forward, it is imperative that these funds are utilized strategically to address the nation’s pressing needs and lay the foundation for long-term economic stability. The FAAC disbursement represents not just a financial transaction, but a critical opportunity to shape Nigeria’s future.

  • Power Sector Grapples with N4 Trillion Debt, Fueling Industry Exodus

    Power Sector Grapples with N4 Trillion Debt, Fueling Industry Exodus

    A staggering N4 trillion debt burden is crippling Nigeria’s power sector, prompting manufacturers to abandon the national grid and raising serious concerns about the nation’s economic stability. Adebayo Adelabu, Minister of Power, revealed the alarming figures during the public presentation of the National Integrated Electricity Policy (NIEP) and Nigeria Integrated Resource Plan (NIRP) in Abuja, highlighting a crisis that extends beyond mere financial shortfalls.

    “One of the major issues concerning liquidity is the huge debt in the sector,” Adelabu stated, detailing over N2 trillion owed to electricity generation companies (GenCos), a N1.97 trillion unpaid subsidy for 2024, and N450 billion owed to distribution companies (DisCos) for electricity subsidies. This colossal debt, as I see it, isn’t just a number; it’s a barrier to progress. How can GenCos maintain vital infrastructure and pay their staff when they are owed such substantial sums?

    The ripple effects of this financial strain are palpable. More than 60% of manufacturing firms, even those in areas with grid access, have opted for self-generation due to the unreliability of the national grid. “We all know that there are lots of sensitive manufacturing processes that cannot tolerate a one-minute beep in electricity supply,” Adelabu explained. “Instead of taking such a risk by connecting to a grid that is not reliable, these industries would rather go for self-generation.” This shift, while ensuring operational continuity for manufacturers, significantly inflates production costs, rendering Nigerian products less competitive.

    Read Also: Nigeria Targets $15 Billion in Private Investment to Revamp Struggling Power Sector

    From my perspective, this exodus from the national grid is a symptom of a deeper malaise. The inability to provide consistent and reliable power undermines the very foundation of industrial growth. The human angle here is profound: businesses are forced to choose between operational efficiency and financial viability, leading to increased costs that ultimately burden the average Nigerian consumer.

    The Minister acknowledged the unsustainable nature of current subsidy levels, noting, “The government cannot afford to continue to fund the level of subsidy that our consumption pattern is throwing up.” He proposed a targeted subsidy regime, aiming to support those who truly need it, while also hinting at a re-evaluation of electricity tariffs. “We’ll look at the tariff again…and see how we can improve upon our modest achievement of last year,” he said.

    The NIEP and NIRP are designed to provide a data-driven framework for addressing these challenges. As Adelabu emphasized, these policies aim to “drive the transformation of Nigeria’s power sector through a data-driven and evidence-based approach.” The goal is to create a reliable, sustainable, and inclusive energy future, fostering economic growth and job creation.

    However, the question remains: can these policies effectively address the immediate liquidity crisis and restore confidence in the national grid? The implications are far-reaching. Reliable power is not just about keeping the lights on; it’s about enabling businesses to thrive, creating jobs, and ensuring that Nigerian products can compete in the global market.

    The government’s commitment to reforming the power sector is clear, but the path forward requires decisive action and sustained effort. As I reflect on this situation, it’s evident that resolving the N4 trillion debt crisis is not merely an economic imperative; it’s a crucial step towards building a more prosperous and resilient Nigeria.

  • NACCIMA, OPS to NASS: Remove sections of tax bill that imposes taxes on FTZ

    NACCIMA, OPS to NASS: Remove sections of tax bill that imposes taxes on FTZ

    The Nigerian Association of Chambers of Commerce, Industry, Mines, and Agriculture, NACCIMA, and the Organized Private Sector of Nigeria, OPSN, have called on the National Assembly, NASS, to remove sections of the Nigeria Tax Bill 2024 that imposed new tax burdens on Free Trade Zones, FTZs.

    In its memorandum to NASS, containing observations and recommendations on the proposed bill, NACCIMA argued that the proposed changes in the tax bill, which introduced mandatory minimum tax rates and eliminate tax exemptions previously granted under NEPZA and OGFZA, could lead to capital flight, job losses and legal disputes that would disrupt economic stability.

    The National President of NACCIMA, Dele Kelvin Oye, raised concerns that the bill’s provisions would subject FTZs to state and local government taxes, a departure from the original legal framework that protected the zones from multiple taxation.

    Oye, who is also the Chairman of the Organised Private Sector in Nigeria, highlighted key recommendations, including the removal of the proposed tax provisions affecting FTZs, an amendment of the Nigeria Export Processing Zones Authority, NEPZA, and Oil and Gas Free Zone Authority, OGFZA, laws to maintain tax incentives, and a suspension of the new tax laws for 10 to 15 years to allow businesses adjust their financial models.

    He said:  “Today, Nigeria boasts several successful Free Trade Zones, including the Lekki Free Zone, Onne Oil and Gas Free Zone, and others. These zones have collectively attracted over $200 billion in foreign investments and created more than 600,000 jobs.

    “They play a pivotal role in Nigeria’s economic growth by enhancing export activities and providing a regulatory framework that facilitates business operations.4. Private Sector Leadership in FTZ Operations. It is vital to highlight that the majority (98%) of the Free Trade Zones in Nigeria are privately owned and developed.

    “This demonstrates the inherent capacity of the private sector to drive economic development. The involvement of private entities raises the importance of maintaining a competitive regulatory environment that fosters investment.

    “The Nigeria Tax Bill 2024 proposes amendments that threaten the operational framework of FTZs by introducing mandatory minimum tax rates and removing existing tax exemptions under NEPZA and OGFZA. These changes are poised to diminish investor confidence and negatively impact long-term investment strategies.”

    On arguments against the proposed tax amendments, NACCIMA stated:  “The proposed changes to the tax regime would lead to loss of investor confidence as the removal of foundational tax exemptions can trigger capital flight, as investors may seek jurisdictions with more favorable conditions for business.’’

    ‘On the economic and legal repercussions, Oye said:  “These amendments risk the loss of employment opportunities and hinder the growth of domestic industries reliant on FTZs.

    “The amendments could incite extensive legal challenges, ultimately destabilizing the existing economic landscape.

    “The significance of Free Trade Zones in Nigeria’s economic landscape cannot be overstated. The proposed amendments within the Nigeria Tax Bill 2024 threaten the existing framework that has successfully drawn significant foreign investments and fostered economic growth. Prompt and decisive action from the Senate is crucial to ensuring stability in this vital sector.

    “We urge the committee to evaluate these concerns and take immediate action to preserve the integrity and attractiveness of Nigeria’s Free Trade Zones for both current and prospective investors.

    “By consolidating NACCIMA’s research, insights and recommendations, this presentation seeks to encourage measured discussion and legislative action to secure the economic future of Nigeria through its Free Trade Zones.’’

  • ASUU to NASS: Protect TETFund from abrogation under Nigeria Tax Bill 2024

    ASUU to NASS: Protect TETFund from abrogation under Nigeria Tax Bill 2024

    Abuja—The Academic Staff Union of Universities, ASUU, has prayed the National Assembly to do all within its capacity to protect the Tertiary Education Trust Fund, TETFund, from being abrogated under the Nigeria Tax Bill 2024.

    The union said it was deeply concerned about TETFund because the agency remained a positive testament to its constructive engagements with Nigerian governments since 1992.

    It insisted that it was its considered view that abrogating the TETFund Act 2011, by design or default, would be a great disservice not just to education but also to Nigeria as a nation.

    The association’s position was contained in a presentation by its president, Prof. Emmanuel Osodeke, on the second day of the public hearing organised by the National Assembly on Tax Reform Bills in Abuja, yesterday.

    In the presentation, titled “Debates on the Nigeria Tax Bill, 2024: Our Case for Tertiary Education Trust Fund, TETFund,“ ASUU said it was worried over the proposed abrogation of education tax which, it claimed posed serious threats to the survival of the Tertiary Education Trust Fund.

    The presentation read: “The Academic Staff Union of Universities, ASUU, has monitored with keen interest the debates about review of the tax system in the country, as proposed by the Nigeria Tax Bill, 2024, which is currently before the National Assembly.

    “Of particular interest to our union is the proposed abrogation of education tax which poses serious threats to the survival of the Tertiary Education Trust Fund,TETFund.

    “From any objective assessment, TETFund has been the backbone for infrastructural development, postgraduate training and research capacity building in Nigeria’s public tertiary institutions in the last one-and-half decades.

    “Over 90 percent of capital projects in state and federal colleges of education, polytechnics and universities during this period were TETFund-sponsored.

    “The intervention agency has also remained the primary source of higher degree training for young academics and support staff since 2011 when the Act establishing the Education Tax Fund, ETF, was re-oriented to its original intendment of an intervention agency for the development of tertiary institutions in Nigeria.

    Related News
    Reps want persons with disabilities exempted from paying tax
    Northern Groups Back tinubu’s Tax Reform Bills
    ACF opposes VAT hike, submits recommendations to National Assembly

    “ASUU is seriously worried that the education tax, called development levy, used to bankroll TETFund’s programs, is about to be ceded to the newly established Nigerian Education Loan Fund, NELFUND.

    “Section 59(3) of the Nigeria Tax Bill (NTB) 2024 states that only 50% of the development levy would be made available to TETFund in 2025 and 2026, while NITDA, NISENI, and NELFUND would share the remaining percentages.

    ‘’TETFund will also receive 66.7% in 2027, 2028 and 2029 years of assessment but zero per cent in 2030 year of assessment and, thereafter, from 2030, all funds generated from the development levy will be passed to NELFUND!

    “With all sense of responsibility, ASUU finds this development not only worrisome but also inimical to our national development objective.”

    ASUU said its position was predicated on a number of reasons, which include the following: “Taking any percentage out of education tax (development levy) to service another agency not known to the TETFund Act 2011 is illegal and should not be allowed to stand.

    “Giving zero allocation of development levy to TETFund as from 2030 is a technical way of abrogating the agency; the purported admonishment that TETFund should seek innovative ways of generating its funds is spurious and ill-advised because as a creation of an Act, the institution dies without the fund.

    “Replacing TETFund with NELFUND is comparable to killing a parent to keep a newborn child alive; it is unethical and against the principle of natural justice.

    “The impact of TETFund on the campus of every tertiary institution in Nigeria is beyond description; abrogating it will take public tertiary education many years back and undermine the modest gains in repositioning Nigerian universities for global reckoning and transformative development.

    “Annual supports given to tertiary institutions by TETFund have substantially reduced industrial crises in many tertiary institutions; renovation of old facilities and provision of new ones and opportunities for staff development,  leading to career advancement, have doused labor-related agitations on our campuses.

    “TETFund impacts not only tertiary-level education but also the secondary, down to kindergarten; it directly and/or indirectly supports the production of quality teachers and different categories of support staff in the entire educational system.

    “The Ghana Education Trust Fund, GETFund, borrowed from the Nigerian experience, while some other African countries have recently visited to understudy TETFund.   Nigeria should be improving on the operations and sustainability of the agency, not planning to emasculate or abrogate it.”

  • Naira depreciates to N1,502/$ in parallel market

    Naira depreciates to N1,502/$ in parallel market

    The Naira yesterday depreciated to N1,502 per dollar in the parallel market from N1,500 per dollar on Monday.

    However, the Naira appreciated to N1,501.5 per dollar in the Nigerian Foreign Exchange Market (NFEM)
    Data published by the Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN, showed that the indicative exchange rate for the naira fell to N1,501.5 per dollar from N1,504 per dollar on Monday, indicating N2.5 appreciation for the naira.

    Consequently, the margin between the parallel market and NFEM rate narrowed to 50 kobo per dollar from N4 per dollar the previous day.